Laboratory Methods for the Separation and Purification of Mineral Samples

Authors

  • Richard V. Gaines Institute of Geology, National Autonomous University of Mexico.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22201/10.22201/igl.01855530e.1965.75.89

Keywords:

gravimetric, magnetism, disolution, electrostatic

Abstract

Laboratory methods for separating pure mineralogical components from mixtures—for chemical analysis or other investigations—include gravimetric, magnetic, chemical, flotation, and electrostatic methods, as well as handpicking. Gravimetric methods involve the use of heavy liquids, elutriators, and mechanical devices such as vibrating tables and panning basins. Magnetic methods include the use of hand magnets and more powerful and versatile electromagnetic apparatuses, such as the Frantz Isodynamic Separator. Chemical treatments eliminate undesirable components through leaching. Although flotation and electrostatic methods are comparatively little used in mineralogical laboratories, they hold significant potential. For final treatment, handpicking under a microscope is an operation almost always required to achieve the desired purity. The criteria for selecting mineral separation methods depend on the properties of the mineral to be separated compared to those of the other minerals in the mixture, as well as their relative quantities. To illustrate how these criteria are applied, examples are provided showing the procedural sequence followed for several typical mineral mixtures.

Abstract from:

Gómez-Caballero, J. A. (2005). Historia e índice comentado del Boletín del Instituto de Geología de la UNAM. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana: Volumen Conmemorativo del Centenario Aspectos históricos de la Geología Mexicana, 57I(2), 149-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2005v57n2a3

References

• Fairbairn, H. W. (1955). Concentration of heavy accessories from large rock samples. American Mineralogist, 40, 458-468.

• Flinter, B. H. (1959). Magnetic separation of some alluvial minerals in Malaya. American Mineralogist, 44, 738-751.

• Frost, I. C. (1959). An elutriating tube for the specific gravity separation of minerals. American Mineralogist, 44, 886-890.

• Gaudin, A. M., & Spedden, H. R. (1943). Magnetic separation of sulfide minerals. American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, Technical Publication, 1549, 1-13.

• Hess, H. H. (1956). Notes on operation of Frantz Isodynamic Magnetic Separator. Panfleto publicado por la S. G. Frantz Co., Inc., Trenton, Nueva Jersey.

• Jahns, R. H. (1939). Clerici solution for the specific gravity determination of small mineral grains. American Mineralogist, 24, 116-122.

• Krumbein, W. C., & Pettijohn, F. J. (1938). Manual of sedimentary petrography (Capítulo 14, Métodos de separación). Nueva York: Appleton Century-Crofts, Inc.

• Madhavan, T. R., Karve, V. M., & Somnay, J. Y. (1964). Miniature flotation cell for quantitative testing. Mining Magazine, 110(1), 28-29.

• Mathisrud, G. C. (1942). Magnetic separations in petrography. American Mineralogist, 27, 629-637.

• Murthy, M. V. N. (1957). An apparatus for hand-picking mineral grains. American Mineralogist, 42, 694-696.

• Reed, R. D. (1924). Some methods for heavy mineral investigations. Economic Geology, 19, 320-337.

• Rodda, J. L. (1951). Micro separation of minerals in heavy liquids. American Mineralogist, 36, 625-626.

• Rosenblum, S. (1958). Magnetic susceptibilities of minerals in the Frantz isodynamic magnetic separator. American Mineralogist, 43, 170-173.

• Ross, C. S. (1926). Methods of preparation of sedimentary materials for study. Economic Geology, 21, 454-468.

• Twenhofel, W. H., & Tyler, S. A. (1941). Methods of study of sediments. Nueva York: McGraw Hill Book Co., Inc.

• Tyler, S. A. (1936). Heavy minerals of the St. Peter Sandstone in Wisconsin. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 6, 55-84.

• Vassar, H. E. (1925). Clerici solution for mineral separation by gravity. American Mineralogist, 10, 123-125.

Published

1965-01-01